You’ve done the work.
![]() |
| Photo by AbsolutVision on Unsplash |
You:
-
Gathered information
-
Identified the real problem
-
Developed criteria
-
Generated options
-
Analyzed them
-
Compared them
Now comes the part that separates thinkers from leaders:
Make and implement the decision.
Because disciplined analysis without action is just theory.
Step 1: Identify the Preferred Solution
After comparison, leaders determine the optimum solution.
Not the easiest.
Not the loudest.
Not the most popular.
The best fit based on:
-
Screening criteria
-
Benchmarks
-
Weighted evaluation criteria
-
Alignment with mission
Clarity at this stage builds confidence in the decision.
Step 2: Coordinate Before You Present
If someone else owns final approval, leaders prepare to present their recommendation.
But before presenting:
Coordinate with those affected.
In civilian life, this might mean:
-
Talking to department heads
-
Checking with HR or finance
-
Aligning with assistant coaches
-
Informing school administration
-
Consulting stakeholders
Uncoordinated recommendations create friction.
Strong leaders prevent surprises.

Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash
Step 3: Present Clearly and Persuasively

A great solution can fail if it is poorly communicated.
Doctrine makes an important point:
Problem solving requires both a solution and the ability to communicate it.
Whether verbal or written, leaders must:
-
State the problem clearly
-
Explain the criteria used
-
Summarize the analysis
-
Justify the recommendation
-
Articulate expected outcomes
In business, this may be a decision brief.
In schools, a staff presentation.
In coaching, a team meeting.
Communication skill can be as important as analytical skill.
Step 4: Refine Based on Guidance
Once the decisionmaker provides final guidance, leaders refine the solution.
This may include:
-
Adjusting timelines
-
Modifying scope
-
Clarifying expectations
-
Updating responsibilities
Strong leaders treat feedback as refinement—not rejection.
Step 5: Issue Clear Implementation Instructions
Execution requires clarity.
Formal settings may require:
-
Policy letters
-
Written directives
-
Memorandums
In civilian settings, this might mean:
-
A written implementation plan
-
A clear email outlining steps
-
A rollout meeting
-
Assigned responsibilities and deadlines
Ambiguity kills good solutions.
Specificity drives success.
Step 6: Monitor Implementation
Problem solving does not end at decision.
Leaders:
-
Monitor progress
-
Compare outcomes to benchmarks
-
Measure against the desired end state
-
Identify unintended consequences
Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash
If adjustments are necessary, they make them.
Build Feedback Into the Plan
Every implementation plan must include:
-
Timely feedback
-
Periodic review
-
Flexibility to adjust
Without feedback, leaders cannot:
-
Confirm success
-
Detect failure
-
Improve execution
The goal is not blind execution.
The goal is adaptive execution.
Avoid Creating New Problems
One of the final cautions in doctrine:
Leaders must avoid creating new problems through uncoordinated implementation.
In business, that may mean:
-
Rolling out a policy without informing affected departments
-
Changing compensation structures without consultation
In schools:
-
Adjusting schedules without considering transportation
In coaching:
-
Changing strategy without aligning assistant coaches
Good implementation is synchronized implementation.
Why This Step Matters Most
Many leaders enjoy analysis.
Fewer enjoy accountability.
But leadership requires both.
Decision and implementation:
-
Demonstrate ownership
-
Build credibility
-
Establish momentum
-
Reinforce trust
The discipline of the earlier steps protects this final one.
Final Thought
Problem solving does not end when the “best” solution is identified.
It ends when:
-
The decision is made
-
The plan is communicated
-
The solution is implemented
-
The results are measured
-
Adjustments are made
Leadership is not just thinking well.
It is executing well.
And that is where trust is earned.
Teach it. Coach it. Lead.
JVD
Sources & Credits
Concepts in this article are derived from FM 6-0, Commander and Staff Organization and Operations, Chapter 4, regarding making and implementing decisions within the Army problem-solving process.
This post was drafted with the assistance of AI (ChatGPT) and edited by Mr. VanDusen.


No comments:
Post a Comment